INSTITUTIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL WEAKNESSES IN MUNICIPALITIES AND THEIR IMPACTS ON URBAN RESILIENCE

 

 

Prof. Dr. Firuz Demir Yasamis [1]

 

ABSTRACT

This article investigates the impact of institutional and organizational weaknesses in municipalities on urban resilience to challenges such as climate change, natural disasters, and water crises.

Objectives: The study aims to identify common deficiencies in municipal governance, explore their origins, and evaluate their consequences on cities' adaptive capacities. Additionally, it seeks to propose actionable solutions to enhance institutional strength and improve urban resilience.

Theoretical Framework: Drawing on theories of urban governance and institutional resilience, the research emphasizes the interplay between municipal structures and their capacity to address complex urban challenges effectively.

Method: The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining case study analysis of municipalities with comparative assessments of governance practices. It integrates qualitative data from interviews and reports with quantitative evaluations of municipal performance indicators.

Results and Discussion: The findings reveal that deficiencies in personnel management, budget planning, decision-making processes, and inter-municipal coordination significantly hinder municipalities' ability to respond to climate and crisis-related challenges. Governance inefficiencies, coupled with resource constraints, limit urban adaptability and sustainability. The discussion highlights the necessity of targeted interventions to strengthen organizational capacity and foster collaborative frameworks.

Research Implications: This study underscores the importance of process-oriented institutional development for municipalities. It offers insights for policymakers, urban planners, and municipal managers on improving governance practices and resource management to enhance urban resilience.

Originality/Value: The article provides a unique synthesis of institutional challenges and actionable solutions, bridging the gap between theoretical discourse on urban resilience and practical municipal governance strategies. It contributes to the literature by offering a structured approach to tackling institutional weaknesses, paving the way for more sustainable urban futures.

Keywords: Municipal governance, institutional weaknesses, urban resilience, climate change, SDG, natural disasters.

 

ÖZ

Bu makale, belediyelerdeki kurumsal ve örgütsel zayıflıkların, iklim değişikliği, doğal afetler ve su krizleri gibi zorluklara karşı kentsel dayanıklılık üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir.

Amaçlar: Çalışma, belediye yönetimindeki yaygın eksiklikleri belirlemeyi, bu eksikliklerin kökenlerini araştırmayı ve şehirlerin uyum kapasitesi üzerindeki sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, kurumsal güçlülüğü artırmak ve kentsel dayanıklılığı geliştirmek için uygulanabilir çözümler sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Teorik Çerçeve: Kentsel yönetişim ve kurumsal dayanıklılık teorilerinden yola çıkan araştırma, belediye yapılarının karmaşık kentsel sorunlarla etkin bir şekilde başa çıkma kapasiteleri ile ilişkisini vurgulamaktadır.

Yöntem: Araştırmada, belediyelerin vaka analizi ile yönetişim uygulamalarının karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmelerini birleştiren karma yöntemli bir yaklaşım kullanılmaktadır. Görüşmelerden ve raporlardan elde edilen nitel veriler ile belediye performans göstergelerinin nicel değerlendirmeleri bir araya getirilmiştir.

Bulgular ve Tartışma: Elde edilen bulgular, personel yönetimi, bütçe planlaması, karar alma süreçleri ve belediyeler arası koordinasyon gibi alanlardaki eksikliklerin, belediyelerin iklim ve krizle ilgili zorluklara yanıt verme yeteneklerini önemli ölçüde engellediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Yönetişimdeki verimsizlikler ve kaynak kısıtları, kentsel uyum ve sürdürülebilirliği sınırlamaktadır. Tartışma kısmı, örgütsel kapasitenin güçlendirilmesi ve işbirlikçi çerçevelerin geliştirilmesi için hedefe yönelik müdahalelerin gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

Araştırma Çıkarımları: Bu çalışma, belediyeler için süreç odaklı kurumsal gelişimin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Politika yapıcılar, şehir plancıları ve belediye yöneticilerine, yönetişim uygulamalarını ve kaynak yönetimini iyileştirme yolunda değerli öngörüler sunmaktadır.

Özgünlük/Değer: Makale, kurumsal zorluklar ve uygulanabilir çözümler üzerine benzersiz bir sentez sunarak, kentsel dayanıklılık üzerine teorik tartışmalar ile belediye yönetimi stratejileri arasındaki boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Kurumsal zayıflıkların üstesinden gelmek için yapılandırılmış bir yaklaşım sunarak, daha sürdürülebilir kentsel gelecekler için yol açmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Belediye yönetimi, kurumsal zayıflıklar, kentsel dayanıklılık, iklim değişikliği, SDG, doğal afetler.

1 INTRODUCTION

The institutional and organizational weaknesses of municipalities can significantly impede the effectiveness and performance of local governments. Municipalities require a robust institutional framework, effective governance structures, meaningful public participation, and long-term strategic planning to enhance urban resilience. Identifying and addressing these weaknesses is, therefore, a critical step toward fostering resilient and sustainable cities.

As pivotal institutions responsible for providing and maintaining essential services to local communities, municipalities play a crucial role in shaping urban resilience. However, deficiencies in their institutional and organizational capacities often undermine these efforts. Weaknesses such as inadequate strategic planning, limited adaptability, and insufficient governance structures can severely reduce a municipality’s capacity to respond effectively to emerging urban challenges. This interplay of institutional weaknesses poses a significant barrier to resilience and sustainable urban development. Thus, it is imperative for municipalities to confront these challenges and strengthen their institutional capabilities to mitigate adverse effects on urban resilience.

The objective of this article is to explore the relationship between urban resilience and the institutional capacities of local government bodies, emphasizing the strong and positive correlation between resilience and institutional strength. Specifically, the research seeks to address the following questions:

• What are the key factors that negatively affect urban resilience?
• What are the primary institutional weaknesses of municipalities?
• How can municipal organizational development promote urban resilience?

Despite the critical importance of these issues, there is a noticeable lack of scientific and field research examining the relationship between municipal organizational development and urban resilience. This article aims to address this gap by contributing to the growing body of knowledge on this subject, offering insights that can guide future research and practical applications.

 

2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

2.1 KEY INSTITUTIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL WEAKNESS IN MUNICIPALITIES

1. Lack of Good Governance: A significant weakness in municipalities is the lack of good governance. Without transparent, accountable, participatory, and effective governance, it becomes challenging to deliver services that align with the expectations of local communities.
2. Insufficient Resource Management: Issues in budget management, resource allocation, and utilization can jeopardize the sustainability of projects and services, posing a significant barrier to resilient urban development.
3. Lack of Training and Capacity: Inadequate training and capacity among municipal staff can hinder their ability to adopt modern management practices. This, in turn, impairs their ability to respond effectively during crises and contribute to urban resilience.
4. Partisanship, Favoritism and Nepotism: The dominance of political influences and nepotism (favoritism based on familial ties) in municipalities promotes loyalty-based governance over merit-based administration, undermining effective service delivery and resilient urban development.
5. Lack of Public Participation: The failure to encourage local community participation may prevent municipalities from accurately understanding local needs and fostering active community involvement in resilient urban development.
6. Deficiencies in Environmental and Social Impact Analysis: Neglecting environmental and social impact analyses in planning and project development processes can weaken sustainability and resilience in urban growth.
7. Inadequate Infrastructure: Insufficient investment in infrastructure reduces resilience to natural disasters, climate change, and other emergencies.
8. Poor Communication and Coordination: Ineffective communication and coordination among municipal departments and staff can hinder response efforts during crises.
9. Capacity and Resource Deficiencies: The lack of sufficient capacity or resources in critical areas such as infrastructure, disaster management, and social services diminishes resilience.
10. Corrupt or Ineffective Governance: Corruption or inefficiency erodes public trust and weakens municipalities’ ability to utilize resources effectively.
11. Disaster Preparedness and Response: Municipalities must be prepared for disasters and capable of responding effectively to crises. Institutional and organizational weaknesses can undermine these capacities, exacerbating the impacts of disasters.
12. Social and Economic Inequality: Municipalities play a crucial role in reducing social and economic inequalities. Institutional and organizational weaknesses can hinder these efforts, leaving communities more vulnerable.
13. Environmental Sustainability Challenges: Municipalities are vital to building sustainable communities. Weaknesses in their structures and processes can obstruct sustainability initiatives and worsen the effects of climate change and other environmental challenges.
14. Exacerbating Social and Economic Inequalities: Weaknesses in municipal social service programs may leave vulnerable communities more exposed to disasters or other challenges. For example, inadequate social services can lead to disproportionate harm for at-risk groups during crises.

 

2.2 CONCRETE EXAMPLES HIGHLIGHTING NEGATIVE IMPACTS

The following examples demonstrate the adverse effects of institutional and organizational weaknesses in municipalities on urban resilience. They underline the importance of robust, resilient, and effective local governance structures to improve urban resilience.

• Ability to Make and Implement Quick Decisions: Example: In a natural disaster, slow decision-making processes due to bureaucratic hurdles can delay emergency response and recovery efforts. This may result in challenges in addressing the urgent needs of affected populations.
• Community Participation and Awareness Levels: Example: A municipality failing to involve local residents in urban planning or disaster preparedness efforts, or lacking effective communication strategies, can lower public awareness. This may lead to communities being unprepared for emergencies and unable to participate actively in response efforts.
• Sustainable Infrastructure Investments: Example: A municipality's inability to plan and invest in long-term sustainable infrastructure may result in vulnerabilities. For instance, inadequate flood management infrastructure (such as early flood warning systems) can exacerbate water damage and economic losses during heavy rainfall or flooding.
• Crisis Management Capabilities: Example: Insufficiently trained crisis management teams or ineffective communication during emergencies can complicate disaster response. Misinformation or coordination failures can lead to inefficient resource use and increased challenges in managing the crisis.
1. Inadequate Adaptation to Climate Change
• Example a: During Hurricane Irma in 2017, municipalities in Miami-Dade County, Florida, faced significant gaps in disaster planning and coordination, delaying recovery and complicating relief efforts.
• Example b: The 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami revealed vulnerabilities in infrastructure and disaster management in Sendai, Japan, leading to significant loss of life and extensive damage.
• Example c: Hurricane Katrina (2005), New Orleans, USA: Insufficient preparation and coordination delayed emergency response efforts. Weak infrastructure and crisis management systems further reduced urban resilience, leaving the city vulnerable to large-scale disasters.
• Example d: Japan's urban areas demonstrated resilience to earthquakes and tsunamis, but the Fukushima nuclear disaster highlighted weaknesses in energy infrastructure. This event underscored the importance of considering the environmental and social impacts of energy facilities.
• Example e: Istanbul Floods (2009), Turkey: Heavy rains caused severe flooding in Istanbul, exposing weaknesses in infrastructure and issues related to unplanned urbanization. The municipality's failure to manage the crisis effectively amplified the disaster's impact. 31 people killed.
• Example f: Valencia (Spain) Flood (2024): In late October 2024, a high-altitude isolated depression struck eastern Spain, bringing severe weather, torrential rainfall, and flash floods. The disaster caused widespread damage and led to casualties. 224 people lost their lives, 13 remained missing.

These examples emphasize the critical role of effective municipal governance in reducing vulnerabilities and fostering urban resilience.

2.3 ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGERIAL ISSUES IN MUNICIPALITIES: ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS, OBJCTIVES, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

The establishment of organizational goals, objectives, policies, and strategies is critical for effectively managing an institution. However, the lack or ambiguity of these elements can lead to several problems:

1. Unclear Service Goals: The absence of clear service goals may leave employees unsure of the direction in which they should exert effort. This can hinder the achievement of effective performance.
2. Lack of Performance Indicators: Uncertainty about how to measure service performance can obstruct the evaluation and improvement of the institution’s achievements. Without performance indicators, tracking progress towards goals becomes difficult.
3. Lack of Policies and Strategies: Insufficient efforts in developing deliberate and structured policies and strategies can cause difficulty in determining the organization's direction towards long-term goals. This weakens the organization’s ability to maintain competitive advantage and adapt to changing conditions.
4. Underdeveloped Financial Performance: The lack of a developed concept of financial performance can limit the organization’s ability to effectively use financial resources, create budgets, and ensure financial sustainability.

To address these issues, organizations must establish clear service goals, define performance indicators, develop structured policies and strategies, and manage their financial performance effectively. Moreover, it is essential to encourage employee participation and promote a culture of continuous improvement in the process of creating these elements.

2.4 INTERNAL ORGANIZATION

Issues in internal organization can negatively impact the effectiveness and efficiency of an institution. Some common problems in the internal organization systems of municipalities are outlined below:

1. Shared Responsibility in Similar Service Areas: When multiple departments are responsible for similar service areas, coordination can be difficult, and the effective use of resources may be hindered.
2. Lack of Rational Distribution: The lack of a rational distribution of tasks, authority, and responsibilities among departments can obstruct effective decision-making processes and complicate collaboration.
3. Absence of an Appropriate Unit for Specific Tasks: In some cases, the lack of a suitable department or unit to carry out a specific task may lead to a lack of services.
4. Failure to Respond to New Services: The organization’s inability to adapt to rapidly changing conditions and respond to new types of services can result in a loss of competitive advantage.
5. Inadequate Organization: Insufficient, incorrect, and incomplete organization of departments, directorates, and branch offices can hinder the effective execution of work processes.
6. Insufficient Service Quality: The produced service may be insufficient in terms of quantity and quality, which can negatively impact customer satisfaction.
7. Unclear Authority and Tasks: Uncertainty and improper task distribution among deputy mayors and other senior executives can lead to a lack of effective leadership and management.
8. Heavy Workload and Neglect of Real Tasks: The heavy daily workload of mayors may prevent them from carrying out their actual duties, affecting strategic management activities.
9. Overlapping, Gaps, and Redundancies in Authority and Tasks: Unclear authority boundaries, task gaps, and redundancies can hinder effective decision-making processes and lead to internal conflicts.
10. Mamudism and Alzheimer’s disease: [2] Factors such as Mamudism (the increasing complexity of tasks over time) and Alzheimer’s disease (issues like memory loss and information loss) can negatively affect internal processes and performance within the organization.

 

2.5 MANAGEMENT COMPETENCE

Management competence is a crucial factor for the effective and efficient management of an institution. The observations I made during the institutional development studies that I conducted in various municipalities regarding the underdevelopment of management competence are as follows:

1. Service Integration: Management should develop and implement the necessary strategies to ensure the service integrity of the institution. This includes coordination and collaboration between different departments.
2. Centralization of Authority and Delegation: Proper centralization or delegation of authority can support faster decision-making processes. This can increase flexibility and speed within the institution.
3. Coordination: Management should ensure coordination between different departments. This involves conducting processes and services in a harmonized manner and focusing on institutional goals.
4. Resource Planning and Management: Management should effectively plan and manage the institution's available resources. This includes budgeting, financial sustainability, and strategic investments.
5. Work Planning and Scheduling: Management should effectively plan and schedule employees' workloads. This contributes to the regular and efficient execution of work processes.
6. Job Description, Classification, Workload Analysis, and Human Resources Management Techniques: Management should correctly define and classify tasks within the organization and conduct workload and skill gap analyses. Additionally, contemporary human resources management techniques should be used to improve personnel management.
7. Technical Processes: Management should ensure the effective execution of technical processes. This includes production, service delivery, and other technical activities.
8. Preventive Maintenance in Technical Services: Management should plan and implement preventive maintenance in technical services. This can enhance the efficiency of tools and equipment and contribute to the prevention of breakdowns.
9. Standardization of Services: Management should ensure the standardization of services. This can improve quality, reduce costs, and make processes more predictable.

 

2.6 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

Human resources management involves effectively managing the employees, who are the most valuable assets of an institution. The following are some issues related to human resources management:

1. Employee Qualifications: Human resources management should accurately identify the qualifications of employees, place them in appropriate positions, and assign tasks that align with their skills. This can increase productivity and help achieve institutional goals effectively.
2. In-Service Training: Offering continuous training opportunities to employees is essential to keep their knowledge and skills up to date and to enhance their development. This can increase employee motivation and improve job performance.
3. Excess of Unqualified Personnel and Service Costs: Human resources management should be aware of the excess of unqualified personnel and perform workforce planning to improve cost-effectiveness.
4. Employee Turnover Rate: Frequent changes in the workforce are referred to as employee turnover. Human resources management should aim to keep this rate low, as high turnover increases costs and can create instability within the institution.
5. Motivation / Willingness to Work: Human resources management should implement various motivation strategies to enhance employees' motivation and willingness to work. This ensures that employees are more engaged in their work.
6. Fair and Sustainable Workload for Employees: Human resources management should ensure that employees are given a fair and sustainable workload. Excessive workload can reduce motivation and decrease employee productivity.

Effectively managing these aspects enables an institution to evaluate its employees correctly, motivate them, and enhance productivity.

---

2.7 MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING: COST CENTER BASED PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT

1. Concept of Cost Recovery and Institutionalization: Municipalities should assess the return on their expenditures and investments. The cost of investments should be compared with the quality and impact of the services provided. This is crucial for the municipality's sustainability and long-term financial health. Municipalities in Turkey also face challenges here, as legal regulations are insufficient.
2. Unit and Total Cost of Services: Municipalities must determine the costs of the services they provide and manage their budgets effectively. This includes calculating the unit cost of services and keeping the total cost under control. This process requires municipalities to use their resources efficiently.
3. Cash Performance Concept: Cash performance refers to measuring and evaluating the financial performance of the municipality. This concept is used to understand the municipality's revenues, expenditures, and overall financial status. By setting performance metrics, the municipality can assess how close it is to achieving its goals.
4. Challenges of the Current Accounting System in Effective Decision Making: The current accounting system does not assist in making effective and accurate decisions in the municipality's general management. This highlights the need for the establishment of an effective financial management system, or management accounting system. Transitioning to a more effective accounting system or revising the existing one should enable better analysis of financial data and improve decision-making processes.

 

3 METHODOLOGY

This study employs a mixed-methods approach to examine the institutional and organizational weaknesses of municipalities and their impact on urban resilience. By integrating qualitative and quantitative methods, this approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by municipalities and potential solutions to enhance their capacities.

3.1 Research Design

The study is structured around case study analysis and comparative assessments of governance practices. Case studies were selected to provide in-depth insights into the institutional and operational dynamics of municipalities in diverse geographic and socio-economic contexts. Comparative assessments allow for evaluating governance practices across municipalities, highlighting common challenges and effective strategies.

3.2 Data Collection

1. Qualitative Data:
• Interviews: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, including municipal officials, urban planners, policymakers, and community leaders. These interviews aimed to capture their perspectives on institutional weaknesses, governance practices, and their implications for urban resilience.
• Document Analysis: Policy documents, municipal reports, strategic plans, and other archival materials were reviewed to identify patterns of institutional and organizational challenges.
2. Quantitative Data:
• Performance Indicators: Municipal performance data were collected and analyzed to evaluate institutional efficiency and service delivery effectiveness. Indicators included budget utilization rates, response times to crises, community satisfaction surveys, and resilience-related metrics such as disaster preparedness and resource allocation.

3.3 Data Analysis

• Qualitative Analysis: Thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring patterns and themes from interview transcripts and documents. Key themes included governance gaps, resource constraints, and organizational inefficiencies.
• Quantitative Analysis: Statistical methods were used to assess municipal performance indicators and compare results across different municipalities. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between institutional strength and urban resilience outcomes.

3.4 Comparative Framework

A comparative framework was developed to assess governance practices, focusing on factors such as leadership structures, inter-municipal coordination, stakeholder engagement, and strategic planning. Municipalities were categorized based on their governance practices, and best practices were identified to offer actionable recommendations.

3.5 Validation and Triangulation

To ensure the validity and reliability of the findings, the study employed triangulation by integrating data from multiple sources. This approach minimized biases and provided a more robust understanding of the issues examined.

3.6 Ethical Considerations

The study adhered to ethical research standards, obtaining informed consent from interview participants and ensuring the confidentiality of sensitive data. Institutional approvals were secured where necessary.

3.7 Limitations

While the mixed-methods approach provides comprehensive insights, the study acknowledges potential limitations such as data availability, variations in municipal contexts, and challenges in generalizing findings across diverse regions.

By combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, this methodology captures the complexities of municipal governance and urban resilience, offering a holistic perspective that bridges theoretical insights and practical applications.

 

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: PATHWAYS OF INFLUENCE

 
Institutional and organizational weaknesses in municipalities have the potential to negatively impact urban resilience. Urban resilience refers to a city or region's ability to withstand and adapt to stresses and shocks, such as natural disasters, climate change, and economic crises. Below are some key factors illustrating how these weaknesses may affect urban resilience:

1. Ability to Make and Implement Quick Decisions: Bureaucratic barriers in municipalities can slow decision-making processes. In emergencies, the ability to make and execute decisions rapidly is critical for urban resilience. Institutional weaknesses may cause delays in these vital processes.
2. Community Participation and Awareness Levels: Urban resilience relies heavily on the awareness and involvement of local communities. Weaknesses in participatory governance and efforts to engage communities may lower public awareness and hinder collective action in resilience-building efforts.
3. Sustainable Infrastructure Investments

Long-term sustainability strategies and infrastructure investments by municipalities can significantly enhance urban resilience. However, deficiencies in resource management or planning capabilities can limit the scope and effectiveness of such initiatives.

4. Crisis Management Capabilities: Municipalities' ability to respond to crises plays a crucial role in determining urban resilience. Weaknesses such as lack of training, poor crisis communication, and inadequate coordination can obstruct effective interventions during critical situations.
5. Climate Change Adaptation: Developing strategies to address and adapt to climate change is essential for enhancing urban resilience. However, capacity shortages or lack of expertise in municipalities can hinder the formulation and implementation of effective adaptation strategies.
6. Environmental and Social Impact Analysis: Failure to conduct environmental and social impact analyses during planning processes weakens the sustainability and resilience of urban development. This oversight can exacerbate vulnerabilities and compromise long-term resilience objectives.

 

5 METHODS FOR IMPROVEMENT

Addressing institutional and organizational weaknesses is critical for strengthening urban resilience. By implementing appropriate measures, municipalities can enhance their efforts to build resilient cities and contribute to making communities safer, fairer, and more sustainable. These measures may include:

1. Improving Communication and Coordination: Municipalities should take steps to ensure effective communication and coordination among their departments and staff. This will facilitate faster and more efficient responses during crises.
2. Ensuring Adequate Capacity and Resources: Municipalities must have sufficient capacity and resources in critical areas such as infrastructure, disaster management, and social services. This preparedness will enable them to handle emergencies and respond effectively during crises.
3. Preventing Corruption and Ineffective Management: Municipalities should implement robust measures to combat corruption and inefficiency. Strengthening transparency and accountability will enhance public trust and ensure more effective utilization of resources.

---

6 NEGATIVE IMPACTS THAT EXACERBATE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INEQUALITIES

1. Vulnerable Infrastructure in Low-Income Communities: In the United States, low-income communities often have more vulnerable infrastructure and are more exposed to disasters. This amplifies the impacts of such events, further worsening social and economic inequalities.
2. Inadequate Infrastructure in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas: In Brazil, the city of Rio de Janeiro struggles to provide adequate infrastructure and services to impoverished communities known as "favelas." This leaves them more vulnerable to disasters and exacerbates the effects, increasing disparities.
3. Challenges in Adapting to Climate Change: The growing impacts of climate change pose a significant threat to urban resilience. Municipalities play a critical role in helping communities adapt to and mitigate these effects. However, institutional and organizational weaknesses can hinder these efforts. For example, if a municipality fails to develop effective climate adaptation plans, the city becomes increasingly vulnerable.
4. Environmental Degradation and Resilience: Pollution and other environmental challenges also threaten urban resilience. Municipalities have an essential role in protecting the environment and building sustainable communities. However, institutional and organizational shortcomings can impede these efforts. For instance, inadequate environmental protection programs can result in cities becoming more polluted and less resilient.

These examples highlight how institutional and organizational weaknesses in municipalities can negatively impact urban resilience. They emphasize the need for local governments to develop strong institutional frameworks, effective crisis management systems, and sustainable planning strategies.

 

7 FACTORS NEGATIVELY AFFECTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

1. Climate Change Impacts: The increasing effects of climate change pose a substantial threat to urban resilience. Municipalities are pivotal in helping cities adapt to and mitigate these impacts. Institutional and organizational deficiencies, however, can obstruct progress. For example, inadequate climate adaptation planning by a municipality can leave the city more vulnerable to extreme weather events and other climate-related challenges.
2. Pollution and Environmental Challenges: Environmental issues, including pollution, also undermine urban resilience. Municipalities play a vital role in safeguarding the environment and fostering sustainable communities. Yet, institutional and organizational weaknesses can hinder these initiatives. For example, if a municipality’s environmental programs are underdeveloped, the city may face increased pollution and reduced resilience.

These examples underscore how weaknesses in institutional and organizational structures adversely affect urban resilience and sustainable development. By addressing these weaknesses, municipalities can take significant steps to create safer, fairer, and more sustainable communities.

 

8 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND URBAN RESILIENCE

The local government system operates under conditions widely regarded as significant obstacles to effective state governance. Local governments -provincial administrations, municipalities, and village councils- have deep historical roots and have become pivotal institutions reflecting the socio-economic and political realities of the periods in which they were established. However, in the context of today's evolving socio-economic and political conditions, the relevance and efficacy of local governments are constantly scrutinized.

Provincial administrations have largely lost their influence, serving primarily as extensions of central government in rural areas, while failing to achieve development goals at the district level as outlined in national development plans.

Municipalities, on the other hand, have struggled to effectively manage, direct, and regulate urban growth driven by rapid urbanization. Faced with the scale and complexity of urban challenges, municipalities have often fallen short in addressing these issues successfully.

The root cause of these shortcomings lies less in the attitudes and behaviors of the central government and more in the inability of municipalities to modernize their institutional (organizational, managerial, and resource planning) capabilities. This deficiency has hindered the evolution of local governments to meet contemporary needs and limited their ability to deliver effective performance.

 

9 REASONS BEHIND MUNICIPAL FAILURES

The challenges municipalities face are diverse and interconnected, collectively undermining their ability to function effectively as local governing bodies. Key factors contributing to municipal failures include:

1. Limited Own-Source Revenue and Tax Collection Challenges

Municipalities have limited own-source revenue streams, and their tax collection processes are often compromised by political influences. This dependency on centrally allocated tax shares constrains their ability to generate sustainable income.

2. Employment of Unqualified Personnel and Budgetary Pressures

Excessive hiring of unqualified staff hampers performance and places additional strain on municipal budgets, exacerbating operational inefficiencies.

3. Rising Debt Burden

Municipalities face an increasing debt load, raising concerns about their fiscal sustainability.

4. Poor Management and Internal Organization

Ineffective management practices and flawed internal organizational structures negatively impact operational efficiency.

5. Limited Resource Planning and Collaboration Opportunities

Municipalities often lack effective resource planning and coordination mechanisms, hindering the execution of impactful projects.

6. Inability to Generate Local Resources

A lack of capacity to generate local resources limits financial independence and sustainability.

7. Misguided Spending Policies and Lack of Transparency

Poor spending practices lead to budgetary issues, while a lack of transparency fosters corruption and inefficiency.

8. Financial Losses in Economic Ventures

Municipal economic initiatives often result in financial losses, contributing to resource waste.

9. Irregularities and Corruption in Procurement

Corruption and irregularities in procurement processes undermine transparency and accountability.

10. Limited Competency Levels

Insufficient institutional capacity restricts effective decision-making and implementation.

11. Excessive Oversight by Central Government

Stringent central government oversight (tutelage) restricts the autonomy of local governments, limiting their ability to act independently.

12. Absence of a Local Tax and Revenue Base

Municipalities have failed to establish a robust system of local taxes and fees, creating challenges in achieving financial independence.

These issues highlight the pressing need for reform in local government structures and practices to foster urban resilience, financial sustainability, and effective governance.

 

10 METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES

Metropolitan municipalities have faced various challenges due to a poorly designed system. The search for solutions to urbanization-related problems has become increasingly complex as cities grow larger. This complexity, coupled with a misdiagnosis of the issues and ineffective solutions, has left urban problems in expanding metropolitan areas unresolved.

Over approximately 40 years, the system has been a growing topic of debate regarding its effectiveness in addressing the problems of large cities. During this time, the division of local political power within urban boundaries has resulted in the emergence of rival and conflicting political groups.

In the metropolitan municipality system, no reasonable, realistic, or scientifically valid criteria have been established for the division of duties, authority, responsibilities, and resources between upper-tier metropolitan municipalities and lower-tier district municipalities. This has prevented the system from functioning effectively.

The lack of a homogeneous institutional structure across metropolitan and district/subordinate municipalities, combined with inconsistencies and errors in the initial design of the system, raises significant doubts about the viability of the metropolitan municipality model as a solution.

Additionally, the presence of various bureaucratic pathologies and ethical shortcomings, similar to those found in central government bureaucracies, underscores the need to reevaluate the system from a broader perspective.

 

11 MAIN FINDING: THE NEED TO TRANSFORM THE MANAGEMENT APPROACH

Reforming the management approach is critical for improving public administration. Key areas that require attention include:

1. Insufficient Managerial Competence: The limited development of knowledge, skills, and abilities among managers in public administration is a significant issue. Investments in training and capacity-building are necessary to enhance managerial competence.
2. Lack of Performance-Based Management: Public administration lacks a management approach focused on improving and maximizing performance. This deficiency hinders effective planning and organization.
3. Weak Accountability and Goal-Setting: A structure that prevents individual accountability dominates public administration. Furthermore, public institutions are not sufficiently organized to set concrete and measurable goals, complicating the establishment of effective governance.
4. Lack of Market and Customer Orientation: Public services are not perceived as marketable commodities, nor are citizens regarded as customers who contribute to these services. This mindset limits the ability to provide high-quality services. A customer-oriented approach that prioritizes citizen satisfaction is essential.

To address these issues, measures should include developing managerial competencies, adopting a performance-focused management approach, promoting individual accountability, setting concrete objectives, and incorporating a customer-oriented perspective to enhance service quality. These changes can lead to the efficient delivery of public services, strengthening and modernizing public administration.

---

12 AN ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY: CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Corruption in public administration poses serious challenges, undermining public trust. Key issues include:

1. Various Forms of Corruption: Corruption manifests in forms such as bribery, embezzlement, extortion, and fraud in tenders, theft of public funds, and the misuse of financial institutions. These practices hinder the effective and equitable use of public resources, harming societal welfare.
2. Special Privileges and Public Financial Resources: Public resources, especially public loans, are often allocated as special privileges to political allies. This politicization of financial resources compromises fairness and allows for electoral manipulation.
3. Institutionalization of Bribery: Bribery has become a prerequisite for conducting business within public institutions. This obstructs fair competition, undermines merit-based recruitment, and decreases institutional efficiency.
4. Erosion of Ethical Standards: Ethical standards in public administration have significantly eroded. This diminishes the reliability of public officials and institutions, leading to a broader moral decline in society.
5. Ethical Crisis in Politics and Public Administration:The ethical crisis in politics and public administration erodes public trust in leaders and institutions, undermining the functioning of democratic processes.

To combat these challenges, it is crucial to adopt a governance model based on ethical values, strengthen transparency and accountability mechanisms, enforce effective auditing systems, and implement zero-tolerance policies against corruption. Additionally, raising public awareness and conducting educational programs to promote ethical conduct are essential for fostering a culture of integrity.

 

13 THE RESULTS OF URBAN GROWTH: MORE POPULATION, LARGER AREAS, MORE SERVICES AND MORE DIVERSE SERVICES AND MUNICIPALITIES’ ABILITY TO SOLVE THESE ISSUES

The phenomenon of urban growth brings a series of consequences and exposes municipalities to various challenges. Some of the results of urban growth are as follows:

1. Increasing Population: Urban growth often leads to population increases. This situation requires municipalities to exert more effort to accommodate more people, meet their needs, and maintain living standards.
2. Expanding Areas: The expansion of cities increases the need for infrastructure. Municipalities are compelled to develop new plans and projects to extend roads, water and energy systems, and create more residential and commercial areas.
3. Rising Service Demands: A growing population and expanding areas lead to an increased demand for municipal services. There is a growing need for basic services like education, health, security, and transportation. Municipalities must find more effective and sustainable solutions to meet these rising demands.
4. Diversified Services: People living in large cities often require a wider variety of services. This means municipalities must provide services in areas such as culture, art, and entertainment, in addition to the basic services.

However, municipalities have limited capacity to deal with the challenges posed by these phenomena. Rapid urbanization strains municipalities in terms of effective planning, resource management, infrastructure development, and the sustainable delivery of social services. Therefore, in order to cope with urban growth, strategic and long-term planning, as well as effective resource management and cooperation mechanisms, are crucial.

 

14 LIMITATIONS OF PROCESS ORIENTED MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKS

The resolution of the institutional, organizational, and managerial weaknesses mentioned above depends on the reforms implemented within the municipality. However, there are significant limitations to the success of these reforms:

1. Employee Morale and Motivation Issues: Morale and motivation problems among municipal employees can affect their job satisfaction and commitment. Job dissatisfaction and low motivation can negatively impact service quality. Therefore, personnel management, motivation-enhancing policies, and effective communication strategies are crucial.
2. Rapid Growth Rate of Cities: Rapid urbanization can lead to increased demand for infrastructure, transportation, housing, and services. Municipalities need to develop effective planning, resource management, and infrastructure development strategies to cope with this rapid growth and ensure sustainable development.
3. Unawareness of the Positive Contributions of Management Technology Development: Today, technology holds great potential in municipal management. However, to fully leverage this potential, managers and staff need to understand the benefits of technological advancements and integrate these technologies effectively.
4. Inadequacies, Gaps, Ambiguities, Contradictions, and Complexities in Municipal Legislation: Gaps or ambiguities in legislation can complicate municipal management. Inadequate or contradictory regulations can hinder effective decision-making and implementation processes. This highlights the need for updating and clarifying legislation.
5. Negative Impacts of New Measures by the Central Government for Economic Stability: The central government’s economic policies and measures can affect the municipality’s budget and financial situation. Negative impacts may limit municipalities' service delivery capacity and projects. This underscores the need for local governments to cooperate with the central government and quickly adapt to economic changes.

Overcoming these limitations requires effective leadership, strategic planning, education, and collaboration. Municipalities can focus on developing sustainable and effective management models by collaborating at local, regional, and national levels to tackle these challenges.

---

15 BOTTLENECKS IN INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Bottlenecks refer to challenges that hinder or limit the effectiveness and efficiency of an organization. Municipalities face several bottlenecks in this context:

1. Organizational Structure: The organizational structure determines how specific tasks, responsibilities, and authorities are distributed. If the organizational structure is inefficient, issues such as communication difficulties, delays in decision-making, and lack of collaboration may arise.
2. Management Systems: Management systems within an organization determine how internal processes, information flow, and decision-making mechanisms are organized. If these systems are ineffective, decisions may not be made in a timely manner, there may be information shortages, and achieving strategic goals could become challenging.
3. Quality of Personnel: The qualifications, experience, and education level of the personnel within an organization directly affect overall performance. If the quality of personnel is low, challenges may emerge in ensuring smooth operations and achieving organizational goals.
4. Financial Resources: The financial resources available to the organization are used to fund projects, pay staff salaries, invest in technology, and meet other operational needs. If resources are insufficient or not managed effectively, the organization may struggle to maintain its sustainability.

Bottlenecks can arise from both internal dynamics and external factors. Good organizational management should identify and resolve these bottlenecks to ensure the healthy growth of the organization.

 

16 POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF BOTTLENECKS

The potential consequences of not addressing the bottlenecks faced by municipalities are outlined below:

1. Ineffectiveness of Capital Investments: Bottlenecks may lead to the ineffectiveness of capital investments. If factors such as organizational structure, management systems, or financial resource management prevent investments from being used effectively, projects may fail, and the expected returns may not be achieved.
2. Continued Low Service Quality: Internal organizational issues may result in low service quality. If the organizational structure, personnel quality, or management systems are inadequate or ineffective, it could lead to the sustained low quality of services.
3. Expensive Service Production: Bottlenecks may increase the cost of service production due to ineffective financial resource management or low-quality personnel. This could lead the organization to produce services in a costly manner, resulting in the loss of competitive advantage.
4. Economic Implications: Bottlenecks may prevent the organization from achieving its goals in resource utilization. Poorly managed financial resources could pose a risk to economic sustainability.
5. Managerial Implications: Bottlenecks could lead to deficiencies and low levels of service production. This could cause ineffective management, lack of planning, and operational issues.
6. Urban Management and Planning: Bottlenecks may lead to the inability to control urban growth. If the organization faces issues in urban management and planning, infrastructure deficiencies, unplanned growth, and environmental problems could emerge in urban areas.
7. Environmental Impacts: Bottlenecks could degrade the urban environmental quality. If the organization fails to take effective measures in environmental management, issues like air and water pollution may increase.
8. Global Warming, Climate Change, and Reduced Urban Resilience: Bottlenecks may contribute to global warming, climate change, and a decrease in urban resilience. If the organization does not implement sustainability measures, it may struggle to adapt to environmental changes.

Bottlenecks negatively impact the overall performance, customer satisfaction, and sustainability of an organization. Municipal management should proactively identify potential impacts and eliminate bottlenecks to develop more effective strategies. The potential consequences affect the overall success of the organization, environmental sustainability, and social impact. Therefore, organizational management should anticipate these outcomes and eliminate bottlenecks to create more effective strategies.

---

17 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

This article addresses an important issue by examining the impact of institutional and organizational weaknesses in municipalities on the resilience of cities. The analyses and discussions indicate that a strong and effective organizational structure within municipalities has a significant impact on the capacity of cities to withstand various threats, particularly urban challenges such as global warming, climate change, natural disasters, environmental pollution, degradation and nuisances as well as water crises.

The article emphasizes that municipalities play a critical role in sustainable development and urban resilience. By demonstrating how institutional and organizational weaknesses affect municipalities' ability to fulfill these roles, it highlights the importance of addressing these weaknesses in order to effectively confront future urban challenges.

The key conclusion reached is that municipalities will not be able to make cities resilient to natural and climatic disasters unless their institutional, organizational, managerial, and resource planning weaknesses are addressed. In my opinion, enhancing urban resilience can only be achieved with a well-functioning municipal organization and management.

This article offers several suggestions for future research and solutions proposals for municipal organizational and institutional deficiencies:

1. Municipal Cooperation and Coordination: Future research should examine in more detail the effectiveness of inter-municipal cooperation and coordination in terms of urban resilience. Case studies on successful cooperation models and best practice examples could be explored.
2. Technological Innovation and Training: Research focusing on how municipalities adapt to technological innovations and the role of employee training in enhancing resilience could contribute to better preparation for future urban changes.
3. Global Warming: The undeniable link between global warming and climate change must remain a fundamental consideration in municipal planning. Recognizing the critical role of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is essential for mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. Proactive measures to curb emissions can also diminish the likelihood of acid rain and minimize the acidification and eutrophication of local water bodies. Furthermore, promoting renewable energy production serves as a powerful lever for reducing GHG emissions while fostering sustainable urban development.
4. Solution Strategies and Policy Development: Research on effective solution strategies and policy recommendations to reduce institutional and organizational weaknesses could help municipalities create a roadmap for addressing these challenges.

These suggestions aim to provide further information and guidance for increasing municipalities' resilience and preparing urban areas for future challenges.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

AON. (2024). Floods in Eastern and Southern Spain of October 2024: Event Recap as of October 31. Fundación Aon. https://fundacionaon.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Spain-Flooding-Impactforecasting.pdf

Climate Change Post. (2009). Flash floods and urban flooding in Turkey. https://www.climatechangepost.com/countries/turkey/flash-floods-and-urban-flooding/

Gergis, J. (2023). Humanity's moment: A climate scientist's case for hope. Island Press.

Henderson, T., & Friend, T. (2015). Organizational development and change theory: Managing fractal organizing processes. Routledge.

National Centers for Environmental Information (USA). (2011). On this day: 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami.

National Weather Service (USA). (2005). Extremely powerful Hurricane Katrina leaves a historic mark on the northern Gulf Coast. https://www.weather.gov/mob/katrina

National Weather Service (USA). (2017). Hurricane Irma local report/summary. https://www.weather.gov/mfl/hurricaneirma

Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1992). Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 719–822). Consulting Psychologists Press.

World Nuclear Association. (2024). Fukushima Daiichi accident. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-daiichi-accident

Yasamis, F. D. (1970). Konutların yenilenmesi ve şehir ekonomisi: Ankara'da yıkılıp yapılan konutlar üzerine bir inceleme. Türk İdare Dergisi, 326, 110–123.

Yasamis, F. D. (1978). Structural problems of the Turkish local government system. İçişleri Bakanlığı.

Yasamis, F. D. (1988a). Belediyelerde reorganizasyon ve örgütsel gelişme: Çukurova Projesi deneyimleri ışığında. Türk İdare Dergisi, 378, 435–454.

Yasamis, F. D. (1988b). Çevre ve endüstri ilişkilerinde yeni bir dönemeç taşı: ISO 14000. Çevre ve İnsan, 38, 36–417.

Yasamis, F. D. (1988c). Uluslararası çevre yönetimi ölçünü: ISO 14000. Türk İdare Dergisi, 419, 7–34.

Yasamis, F. D. (1989a). Urban infrastructure provision in Ankara. OECD Group on Urban Affairs: Project Group on Urban Infrastructure Policies Case Study No. 9. Paris.

Yasamis, F. D. (1989b). Urban linear infrastructures of Barcelona, Spain. OECD Group on Urban Affairs: Project Group on Urban Infrastructure Policies Case Study No. 8. Paris.

Yasamis, F. D. (1990). Hava kirliliğine ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Çevre ve İnsan Dergisi, 12, 65–70.

Yasamis, F. D. (1991). Hızlı kentleşmenin sonuçları ve belediyelerin kurumsal, örgütsel ve yönetsel olanakları. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 24(3), 163–188.

Yasamis, F. D. (1992a). Kentsel planlamada yeni bir kavram: Serpme evler kuramı. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetim Dergisi, 1(3), 63–66.

Yasamis, F. D. (1992b). Yerel düzeyde çevre yönetimi ve planlamasının ilke ve yöntemleri. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 25(1), 135–156.

Yasamis, F. D. (1992c). Belediyelerin temel gereksinimi: Örgütsel ve yönetsel yeniden yapılanma. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetim Dergisi, 1(5), 17–35.

Yasamis, F. D. (1992d). Evaluation of the Urban Dynamics Model and Land Pricing and Urban Land Allocation Model: Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement. Türk İdare Dergisi, 394, 173–189.

Yasamis, F. D. (1993a). 21. yüzyıla girerken belediyelerimiz çalıştayı. Türk Belediyecilik Derneği & Konrad Adenauer Foundation. Paper presented: 21. yüzyılda Türkiye’de kent yönetimi: Belediyeler 21. yüzyıla girmeli mi?

Yasamis, F. D. (1993b). Belediye reformu. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetim Dergisi, 2(2), 11–24.

Yasamis, F. D. (1993c). Yerel ve bölgesel çevre araştırmaları için bir yaklaşım. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetim Dergisi, 2(5), 27–35.

Yasamis, F. D. (1993d). Belediyelerde yeni yasal düzenlemeler. Yerel Yönetimler ve GAP Sempozyumu, GAP Belediyeler Birliği ve GAP İdaresi, Şanlıurfa.

Yasamis, F. D. (1995). Ulusal ve yerel çevre örgütleri için etkenlik ölçütleri. Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, 5, 228–255.

Yasamis, F.D. (1996a). Belediye Yonetimi. Ankara. 

Yasamis, F.D. (1997). Kamu Yonetimi Kuramında ve Uygulamasında Yeni Gelismeler: Administration'dan Management'a. Turk Idare Dergisi. Ankara. http://www.tid.gov.tr/kurumlar/tid.gov.tr/tum-sayilar(2)/1976-2000/1997/Yil69_417_1997_.pdf

Yasamis, F.D. (1997c).Cevresel Etki Degerlendirmesi.  Ankara. 

Yasamis, F.D. (1999). Supervision and Auditing Local Authorities’ Action. European Council. Local and Regional Authorities in Europe. (CDLR) Committee Report. Report no: 66. With the cooperation of Prof. Juan Santamaria Pastor & Prof. Jean-Claude Nemery. ISBN 92-871-3380-3. Page: 129-146.

Yasamis, F.D. (2000a). European Sociological Association. Environmental Discourses, Policies and Perceptions in Northern and Southern Europe. Bosporus University, Istanbul, 20-24 September 2000.

Yasamis, F.D. (2000b). Turkiye’nin Avrupa Birligi ile Cevresel Butunlesmesi. Yeni Turkiye Dergisi. Ankara. 36: 1032–1056.

Yasamis, F.D. (2001a) Yildiz Technical University. Symposium on Economic and Ecological Perspectives: Land Planning Strategies in the EU. 10-11 November 2001. İstanbul. Paper presented: Strategic Planning Policies of EU and Turkey in the 21st Century.

Yasamis, F.D. (2001b). European Sociological Association. Visions and Divisions. The 5th Congress. 28 Augustus – 1 September 2001. Helsinki, Finland. Paper presented: World Environmental Organization: A Desperate Need.

Yasamis, F.D. (2001c). Turkiye’de Devletin ve Demokrasinin Yeniden Yapılandırılması. İstanbul. 

Yasamis, F.D. (2002). Symposium on European Landscape Convention and Turkey. Yildiz Technical University & İstanbul Goethe Institute.  20-21 October 2002. Paper presented: “Environmental Planning and Management Based on Ecological Basin Planning within the Framework of European Landscape Convention”.

Yasamis, F.D. (2003). Australian Journal of Public Administration. 62(4):93-107. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 62(4):93-107. Blackwell Publishing. Australia.

Yasamis, F.D. (2003a). Cevresel Etki Degerlendirmesi.  CEKUL Vakfı.  Ankara.

Yasamis, F.D. (2003b). State Reform in Turkey: Reasons, Needs and Strategies. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Administration. 62(4) 93-107.

Yasamis, F.D. (2004). European Sociological Association. Environmental Sociology Network. 9-10 September 2004. Gorizia, Italy. Paper presented: Assessing the Performance Levels of National and Local Environmental Organizations: Is Development of a Universal Checklist Possible.

Yasamis, F.D. (2005). World Environment Organization: A Desperate Need for Global Environmental Management. Digesta Turcica. Turkiye Barolar Birligi Dergisi. Ankara. 1: 237-250. 

Yasamis, F.D. (2006). Assessing the Institutional Effectiveness of State Environmental Agencies. Environmental Management. 38(5). 823-836. (DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-2330-9)

Yasamis, F.D. (2007). Assessment of Compliance Performance of Environmental Regulations of Industries in Tuzla (Istanbul, Turkey). Environmental Management. 39(4). 575-586. (DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0129-8)

Yasamis, F.D. (2008). Belediyelerde Kurumsal Gelisme ve Yeniden Orgutlenme. (Institutional Problems in Municipalities and Municipal Reorganization). Eds:  Dr. F. N. GENC and friends. Changing Cities and Changing Local Governments. Ankara

Yasamis, F.D. (2010). Turkiye’de Cevre Yonetimi. Deren Yayın Evi. İstanbul. 

Yasamis, F.D. (2013). Yildiz Technical University, Siegen University and Goethe Institute. International Conference. Global Climate Change. 6-7 November 2013. Istanbul. Paper presented: A New Concept and Concern for National and Global Security: Environment and Ecology.

Yasamis, F.D. (2022). Belediyelerde Yolsuzluk: Nedenler ve Yontemler. (Corruption in Municipalities:  Reasons and Methods). Ed. Sahin Karabulut “Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yonetimi Konuları” (Political Sciences and Public Administration Topics).  Ekin. E-ISBN: 978-625-8235-90-6. Bursa.

 

---

[1] Free lanced.  E-Mail: fyasamis@gmail.com. ORCID: 0000-0002-8756-1366.

 

[2] These terms are invented by the author to contribute to the public administration discipline.